Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Behest
B) Grant
C) Bestowment
D) Devise
E) Bequeath
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Settlement
B) Review
C) Granting
D) Probate
E) Devise
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Standing
B) Vesting
C) Heirship
D) Acknowledgement
E) Consideration
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the land passed to the sole beneficiary named in the will because it was apparent that the deceased meant for him to receive her entire estate.
B) That the estate was partially intestate and that the bank account and land at issue passed through intestate succession.
C) That the land passed to the state because the disposition of it was unclear.
D) That the land would have passed through intestate succession if the decedent had any issue, meaning children or grandchildren; but that because she had no children or grandchildren, the land and bank account passed to the sole beneficiary of the will.
E) That the value of the land and bank account would be split on a 50/50 basis between the sole beneficiary named in the will and the relatives who would inherit through intestate succession.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Undue influence
B) Fraud
C) Negligence
D) Recklessness
E) Misinformation
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied
B) Untrue
C) Limited
D) Reduced
E) Protection
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A settlor may revoke a trust at any time.
B) Settlors may create trusts to prevent individuals from getting access to certain assets.
C) Trusts may be set up to make "awards" to family members who make significant contributions in certain fields, such as education, science, law, or medicine.
D) A trust document may state that the trust will terminate when an event happens, such as when the remainderman reaches a certain age.
E) A court can place assets of a partnership in a constructive trust if it discovers that one partner is engaging in fraudulent or unconscionable conduct that might negatively affect the interests of another partner.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Undue influence
B) Fraud
C) Negligence
D) Recklessness
E) Misinformation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Per behest
B) Per stirpes
C) Per capita
D) Per clear
E) Per ambulatory
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because a will must be in writing, his statement has no effect.
B) Because a will is not usually required to be in writing, his statement was effective to revoke any prior will.
C) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he was angry when he made it.
D) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he believed he was dying at the time he made it.
E) His statement would likely be upheld as an oral will because he made the statement during his last illness in front of witnesses who later wrote down his wishes.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Real
B) Constructive
C) Resulting
D) Validating
E) Actual
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That because the twins were conceived and born after the father's death, they did not survive him as heirs legally and were not entitled to any succession rights.
B) That because the mother had permission from the father to use the sperm after his death, the twins were considered legal heirs and were entitled to succession rights.
C) That regardless of whether or not the mother had permission from the father to use the sperm after his death, the twins were considered legal heirs and were entitled to succession rights.
D) That because the twins were conceived within 30 days of the decedent's death, they were considered legal heirs and entitled to succession rights.
E) That because the mother was alive and the twins were conceived and born after the father's death, they did not survive him as heirs legally and were not entitled to any succession rights; otherwise, had the mother been deceased, the twins would have been entitled to succession rights in regard to the father as well as the mother.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Untrue
B) Involuntary
C) Reviewed
D) Judicial
E) Trustless
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that although extrinsic evidence was not admissible, the letter in and of itself was effective as a matter of law to establish a holographic will and that the companion was entitled to the land at issue.
B) The court ruled that the letter was ineffective as a matter of law to establish a holographic will, that extrinsic evidence was inadmissible, and that the companion was not entitled to the land at issue.
C) After considering the extrinsic evidence at issue which was ruled admissible, the court ruled that the letter was ineffective as a matter of law to establish a holographic will and that the companion was not entitled to the land at issue.
D) After considering the extrinsic evidence at issue which was ruled admissible, the court ruled that the letter was effective as a matter of law to establish a holographic will and that the companion was entitled to the land at issue.
E) The court remanded the case for a trial on the issue of whether, in light of the extrinsic evidence, the decedent intended that the letter at issue effect a testamentary disposition of the land at issue.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is not an effective attestation because she did not witness Carol sign the will.
B) It is effective.
C) It is effective only if Betsy had seen Carol's signature before and could identify the signature as Carol's.
D) It is effective only because a change to a will is involved which has less stringent requirements for the signature of a witness than that required for an original will.
E) It is ineffective only because Carol's attempted change is ineffective.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Per behest
B) Per stirpes
C) Per capita
D) Per clear
E) Per ambulatory
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 64
Related Exams